Energy Navigator logo Energy Navigator 9.36
NBC Section 9.36 compliance platform for new residential construction · Alberta & Saskatchewan · Serving builders, energy modellers, and municipalities
I am a —
Status: ● Live ○ Coming Soon □ Future ✦ Optional → Click any card for full details
▶ Step 1 — Project Submission
Compliance Intake Wizard
Builder Submits a Project
  • Guided step-by-step form collects project details, building specs, and compliance documents
  • Builder selects their compliance path — prescriptive or performance-based
  • Submission confirmed with a 1–2 business day review timeline
Live
▶ Optional — Path Decision Support
Decision Support Tool (Future)
Which Path Costs Less?
  • Shows estimated cost of meeting code via prescriptive vs performance path, side by side
  • Helps builders choose the most affordable route before committing
  • Linked to Volta SNAP modelling for accuracy
Future
Path selected ↓
▶ Step 2 — Compliance Path
■ Prescriptive Path
Document Completeness Check
Is the Submission Complete?
  • Verifies all required documents are uploaded before review begins
  • Blocks incomplete submissions from advancing — saves time for everyone
  • Municipalities receive complete packages — no chasing missing documents
Live
Optional
Technical Review
Does Everything Match the Plans?
  • Insulation values (RSI) verified against building plans
  • Points claimed match code requirements for this tier and region
  • Mechanical systems confirmed to match what was submitted
Live
Compliance Report
Prescriptive Compliance Package
  • Standardized report showing points achieved and how code is met
  • Flags whether a post-construction airtightness test is required
  • Ready to submit to the municipality
Tier Achieved
Tier 1–5
Emissions (GHG)
tCO₂e/yr
Energy Use
GJ/year
Airtightness
ACH50
Upgrade Cost
Future
LiveKey Output
⚡ Performance Path
Optional
Confidence Pre-Screening
How Likely Is This to Pass?
  • Compares submission against past regional projects to predict compliance likelihood
  • Flags high-risk submissions for closer review before a building official opens the file
  • Helps municipalities fast-track straightforward permits
Coming Soon
Energy Modelling Integration
Intake Data Flows into Volta SNAP
  • Builder specs entered at intake automatically populate the energy modelling tool — no re-entry
  • Reduces setup time and data entry errors
  • Phase 2: builders can compare upgrade costs against each performance tier
Coming Soon
Modelling completed ↓
Sol Invictus Client
Internal via Volta SNAP
Model runs internally
  • Results flow directly to municipality — no manual upload
Coming Soon
External Modeller
Third-party service provider
Model runs externally
  • Specs auto-emailed to advisor — report uploaded when complete
Live
Foundation Module — External reports only
Reading the Energy Model
  • Extracts key data from third-party energy model reports — tier, emissions, insulation, fuel type
  • Structures that data so municipalities and policy-makers can actually use it
  • Feeds every downstream module — analytics, confidence scoring, and municipal dashboards
Coming Soon
Optional
AI-Assisted Quality Review
Does the Model Match the Plans?
  • Checks that window specs, insulation values, and heating systems in the model match the building plans
  • Confirms climate zone requirements and correct modelling program used
  • Reduces permit rejections and rework — building officials receive pre-verified submissions
Coming Soon
Compliance Report
Performance Compliance Package
  • Standardized report showing modelled energy performance and how code is met
  • Flags whether a post-construction airtightness test is required
  • Ready to submit to the municipality
Tier Achieved
Tier 1–5
Emissions (GHG)
tCO₂e/yr
Energy Use
GJ/year
Airtightness
ACH50
Upgrade Cost
Future
LiveKey Output
▶ Post-Construction Notification
⚠ Automated Alert
Airtightness Test Required
  • Triggered automatically when a blower door test is required after construction
  • Sent at the same time to all three parties — no one misses the requirement
🏛 Municipality 🏠 Builder 🔧 Energy Modeller
▶ Step 3 — Municipal Review
Municipal Portal
Permit-Ready Package Delivered to Municipality
  • Building official receives a complete, verified compliance package — not a raw application
  • Dashboard shows jurisdiction-wide data on energy performance, emissions, and build specs
  • Phase 1: third-party modeller reports uploaded manually · Phase 2: fully automated
✓ Value to Municipality
Completeness checks and technical review are handled upstream — building officials spend less time on back-and-forth and more time on permit decisions. Click for full value breakdown.
Approve Request Changes Reject
▶ Every Submission Builds the Dataset
National Housing Performance Dataset
Understanding How Canada Builds
  • Every submission adds anonymized data on energy use, emissions, insulation, and fuel types — by region
  • Currently ~80% of this data goes uncaptured nationally — Energy Navigator closes that gap
  • Gives municipalities, provinces, and policy-makers real evidence to inform future building code decisions
Municipalities CHBA National Provinces Federal Policy Researchers Industry Groups
▶ Future Development  show ▼

Energy Navigator serves four distinct user types. Each has their own portal, dashboard, and feature set. Click any feature card for full details.

Live now
Phase 2
Future
Coming soon
🏠
Builder / Developer Portal
What builders see when they log in
Project Dashboard
Active projects, monthly submissions, pass rate, pathway breakdown, efficiency insight
Live
4-Step Compliance Wizard
Guided intake: project info → compliance path → technical specs → documents & submission
Live
Compliance Path Selector
9.36.5 Performance (recommended), 9.36.2–9.36.4 Prescriptive, Tiered paths coming soon
Live
Technical Specification Capture
Full building envelope RSI, mechanical systems, HRV/ERV, MURB secondary suite support
Live
Efficiency Insight
Cost comparison prescriptive vs performance — avg. $5,400 savings per project displayed on login
Live
Project Detail View
6 tabs: Overview, History, Technical, Compliance, Documents, Revision — full audit trail
Live
Compliance & Energy Modelling Results
Reference vs proposed house GJ/year comparison — requires D1 module development
Phase 2
Revision Chat Thread
Threaded messaging between builder and admin — timestamped, persistent record
Live
Document Management
Upload plans, reports, schedules — PDF, DOC, DOCX, XLS, XLSX, DWG, JPG, PNG, TXT (10MB max)
Live
Notifications & Alerts
Real-time alerts for revision requests, blower door flags, status changes
Live
Project Export
Export any project as a formatted compliance report — available on every project detail view
Live
Resources Library
RSI guides, F280 templates, NBC 9.36 reference, Alberta & Saskatchewan resources
Live
Service Provider Directory
Region-matched vetted energy advisors — directory built, public listing pending launch
Phase 2
Common Compliance Hurdles
Top revision reasons across your portfolio — requires sufficient submission volume
Phase 2
Tiered Performance & Prescriptive Paths
9.36.7 & 9.36.8 Tier 1 & 2 live for AB & SK · Tier 3–5 coming · NBC 2025 planned
Live (Tier 1–2)
Volta SNAP Automation
Intake data auto-populates Volta SNAP energy model — eliminates duplicate data entry
Coming Soon
Cost Analysis Overlay
Upgrade cost vs compliance outcome comparison — performance vs cost decision support
Future
🏛
Municipal Dashboard
What building officials see
At a Glance Overview
Total applications, prescriptive/performance split, airtightness target achievement, key insights & alerts
Live
Process Analytics
Avg. time to approval, revision rate, top revision reason — requires D1 and submission volume
Phase 2
GHG Emissions Tracking
Avg. GHG emissions (tCO²e/year), total GHG avoided, avg. energy consumption — requires D1
Phase 2
Tier Distribution Charts
Tier 1–5 breakdown across submissions — requires D1 for accurate tier extraction
Phase 2
Airtightness Analytics
Design airtightness live · As-tested blower door results pending further module development
Partial — See details
Mechanical Systems Breakdown
Adoption rates: HRVs/ERVs, heat pumps, gas and electric water heaters across all submissions
Live
Average Performance Metrics
ACH50, energy use (GJ/year), attic RSI, wall RSI, EnerGuide rating, window-to-wall ratio
Live
Incentive Planning
GHG offsets, net-zero ready homes, est. homeowner savings — requires D1 for accurate data
Phase 2
Benchmarking & Trends
Top performers by airtightness, 90-day trend, provincial comparison insights
Live
Export & Reporting
Export all project data as CSV or PDF — full compliance report download
Live
Filtering & Segmentation
Filter by time period, compliance path, mechanical system, building type, and city
Live
Expedited Permitting
Confidence-based fast-tracking via D3 confidence scoring — low-risk files auto-identified
Phase 2
Embodied Carbon Tracking
Material-level carbon footprint (kgCO²e/m²) — planned for NBC 2025 compliance phase
Future — NBC 2025
🔧
Energy Modeller / Service Provider
Tools for energy modellers and service providers
Structured Intake Access
Complete, structured project specs from builders — auto-generated summary by email or platform
Live
Report Upload & Submission
File upload possible but data extraction requires D1 module — not yet pulling imported data
Pending D1
SP Directory Listing
Directory built, providers added in admin — builder-facing public listing pending launch
Phase 2
Find a Service Provider
Region-matched SPs accessible directly from intake form during blower door planning
Live
Volta SNAP Integration
Builder intake data auto-populates Volta SNAP modelling inputs — eliminates redundant entry
Coming Soon
Account Management Portal
Dedicated SP portal — invoicing, project tracking, performance metrics, client files private
Phase 2
AI-Assisted QA Support
D1 + D2 automated cross-check of model inputs against plans — flags anomalies before submission
Phase 2
Admin Dashboard
Platform operations & oversight — Sol Invictus / Municipal Partner
Aggregated Reporting
Avg. energy consumption 195.50 GJ/year, prescriptive vs performance real-time comparison
Live
Project Management
56 total projects, 32 pending review — searchable by builder, location, status, pathway, building type
Live
Geographic Project Map
Live Leaflet map showing geographic distribution of all submissions across AB & SK
Live
User Management
Role-based access — Builders, Municipal/Agencies, Energy Advisors, Pending Approval tabs
Live
Service Provider Management
Add, edit, approve providers — services, location, region, availability tracked per provider
Live
Resources Management
Curated resource library by province (AB, National, SK) — drag to reorder, add/edit/delete
Live
Feedback Management
Feature requests and user feedback tracked with status, date, user, category, and action controls
Live
Prescriptive vs Performance Comparison
Real-time side-by-side: total projects, compliance rate, avg. attic RSI, avg. wall RSI by path
Live
Technical Data Distribution
Histograms of key performance metrics across all projects — attic RSI, wall RSI distributions
Live

Energy Navigator is licensed by municipalities and agencies through a tiered service model that maps directly to the compliance workflow you just saw. Tier 1 covers the core platform (intake, D4, compliance reports). Tier 2 adds optional AI-assisted QA (D2). Tier 3 adds expedited permitting via confidence scoring (D3). Tier 4 is a one-time data readiness service. Click any tier for full scope details.

Tier 1 — Required
Platform + intake + high-level review
Baseline for all deployments · Automated intake · Prescriptive validation · Performance intake
Pricing: TBD — contact us
Tier 2 — Optional
Technical QA + verification
Risk-based QA · Energy model review · RSI calc verification
Pricing: TBD — contact us
Tier 3 — Optional
Expedited permits + analytics
Confidence-based fast-tracking · Policy insights · Longitudinal analytics
Pricing: TBD — contact us
Tier 4 — Optional one-time
Data readiness + normalization
Prepares historical permit data · Resolves gaps and inconsistencies
Pricing: TBD — contact us
Standalone Data Product
National Housing Performance Dataset
Aggregated Energy & Compliance Data Access

Access to anonymized, structured data on residential energy performance, emissions, insulation levels, fuel types, and compliance tier distribution — aggregated across jurisdictions. Currently ~80% of this data goes uncaptured nationally. Energy Navigator is closing that gap.

Tier A — Summary
Jurisdiction-level dashboard · Included for municipal platform partners
Pricing: TBD
Tier B — Regional
Cross-jurisdiction access · Provinces, CHBA, industry groups
Pricing: TBD
Tier C — National
Full dataset + export rights · Federal policy, FCM, researchers
Pricing: TBD
Municipalities Provinces FCM CHBA National NRCan Academic Researchers Industry Groups
Annual Subscription
Click for details →
Data Access — Standalone Product
Aggregated Dataset Access
National Housing Energy Performance Data
Access to anonymized, structured data on residential energy performance across Alberta and Saskatchewan — tier achievement, emissions, insulation levels, fuel mix, airtightness, and mechanical systems. Data that currently doesn't exist in structured form anywhere else.
Pricing: TBD
Tier A
Summary Dashboard
Jurisdiction-level metrics for municipal platform partners
Included for platform partners
Tier B
Regional Access
Cross-jurisdiction data for provinces, industry groups, and associations
Annual subscription — TBD
Tier C
National Dataset + Export
Full dataset access with export rights — federal policy, research institutions, national bodies
Annual license — TBD
Why this data is unique: ~80% of residential energy performance data in Canada currently goes uncaptured. Energy Navigator is building the first structured, submission-linked dataset of actual build specifications, energy modelling outcomes, airtightness results, and emissions by region. Early access agreements available for research and policy partners.
Municipal Partner Pilot
A structured co-investment pilot program for early adopter municipalities — contact us for pilot structure and participation details
View pilot details →
Energy Navigator's AI compliance modules follow a strict sequential development order driven by data dependencies. D1 must be built first — every downstream module depends on the structured dataset it produces. D4 and D5 develop in parallel and do not depend on the D1–D3 pipeline. Click any module to expand full details, milestones, and scope boundaries.
D1 D2 D3 | D4 D5
Sequential pipeline (D1→D2→D3)  ·  Parallel development (D4, D5 — no dependency on D1–D3)
Priority 1 — First Build
D1 — Energy Model Data Extraction
Lead: 908 AI  ·  Est. 3–4 months
Purpose
Extract structured compliance data from HOT2000 outputs, Full House Reports, and other modelling summaries. This dataset is the foundation for every other AI module.
Core Functions
Parse HOT2000 and Full House Report PDFs
Extract: Tier achieved, ACH50, RSI values by assembly, mechanical systems, emissions
Normalize outputs into a standardized compliance dataset
Store structured results in the Energy Navigator municipal dataset
Flag unreadable or incomplete model reports
Implementation Phases
Phase 1 — PDF Parsing & Ingestion: Ingest documents, identify structure, convert to machine-readable data, extract tables and structured sections
Phase 2 — Metric Extraction & Normalization: Extract Tier, ACH50, RSI, mechanical type, emissions — normalize to standardized schema
Phase 3 — Dataset Storage & Flagging: Store normalized data, generate structured compliance records, flag missing or inconsistent information
Development Milestones
Month 1
Document ingestion framework
Energy model report parsing (HOT2000, Full House Reports, and other supported formats)
Month 2
Metric extraction (ACH50, RSI, mechanical, emissions)
Month 3
Dataset normalization and storage
Flagging system for missing data
Month 4 (optional)
Testing across sample submissions
Dataset validation and stabilization
Output
Structured compliance dataset available for D2, D3, municipal dashboard analytics, and future ML models
Priority 2 — Requires D1
D2 — AI-Assisted Performance Path QA
Lead: University of Alberta  ·  Est. 3 months
Purpose
Support technical QA of performance-path submissions using structured data produced by D1. Supports Tier 2 compliance QA workflows.
Core Functions
Confirm model results meet jurisdiction Tier targets
Cross-check modelling inputs against uploaded plans and schedules
Flag unrealistic or inconsistent modelling assumptions
Generate structured QA summaries for review
Scope Boundaries — This Module Does Not
Replace the professional judgment of a qualified energy modeller or building official
Render binding compliance determinations or code interpretations
Approve, reject, or conditionally approve permit submissions — that authority remains with the municipality
Override or supersede the authority having jurisdiction
Detect or diagnose building science deficiencies beyond defined compliance thresholds — this module checks inputs against plans and code requirements, not building performance outcomes
Development Milestones
Month 1
Define QA rule framework
Develop cross-check logic
Month 2
Automated flagging of inconsistencies
QA summary generation
Month 3
Integration with dashboard
Testing with real submissions
Dependency
D1 output required D2 can begin
D2 cannot begin until D1 has produced its structured dataset
Priority 3 — Requires D1 + D2
D3 — Expedited Permitting Confidence Classification
Lead: University of Alberta  ·  Est. 2–3 months
Purpose
Classify submissions by likelihood of compliance to support expedited municipal review workflows. Supports Tier 3 expedited permitting.
Core Functions
Analyze intake and modelling patterns across submissions
Assign confidence scores: high / medium / low
Identify high-risk or atypical configurations
Enable parallel review workflows for low-risk submissions
Scope Boundaries — This Module Does Not
Automatically approve expedited permits
Replace municipal compliance decisions
Guarantee compliance outcomes
Remove the requirement for human review where required by code
Development Milestones
Month 1
Define confidence classification logic
Month 2
Develop ML-supported pattern detection
Month 3
Integrate scoring with platform workflow
Dependency
D1 D2 D3 can begin
D3 cannot begin until D2 has generated validated compliance outputs
Parallel — No D1 Dependency
D4 — Prescriptive Submission Automation
Lead: Sol Invictus  ·  Est. 2–3 months  ·  Lower urgency
Purpose
Manage prescriptive-path intake completeness verification. Can develop in parallel with D1–D3.
What Needs Refinement
Administrator checklist interface showing required documents
Structured verification that required items are uploaded
Ability to block incomplete submissions from advancing
Manual confirmation of high-level assembly alignment
Automation Approach
Phase 1: Manual-assisted completeness verification — structured document requirements, submission blocking for incomplete files
Phase 2: AI-assisted document verification and assembly alignment once document recognition tools reach sufficient reliability
✓  No dependency on D1–D3. Can be developed concurrently with other modules.
Parallel — No D1 Dependency
D5 — Volta SNAP Integration & Interoperability
Lead: Volta Research Group  ·  Est. 2–3 months  ·  Coming Soon
Purpose
Connect Energy Navigator with Volta SNAP modelling tools so intake data automatically populates Volta SNAP inputs — eliminating duplicate data entry. Developed by Volta Research; proceeds concurrently without consuming 908 or UofA resources.
Phase 1
Navigator → Volta SNAP data transfer
Volta SNAP → Navigator result integration
Automated Full House Report generation
Maintain project IDs and version tracking between systems
Phase 2 — Conditional on Builder Explorer API Readiness
Parametric analysis via Builder Explorer tool (Volta Research + ENBIX)
High-level parametric analysis and upgrade pathway comparisons
Performance vs cost trade-off exploration and early design decision support
Phase 2 cannot begin until Builder Explorer APIs are confirmed stable. This dependency is outside Sol Invictus control.
✓  No dependency on D1–D3. Volta Research-led development proceeds concurrently without consuming 908 or UofA capacity.
Module Development Leads
908 AI
D1 — Energy model data extraction
University of Alberta
D2 — Performance path QA automation
D3 — Expedited confidence module
Volta Research Group
D5 — Volta SNAP interoperability
Sol Invictus
D4 — Prescriptive submission automation
Platform lead & coordination